PRACTICE COLLECTION

Four in a Row — Decisions: compare what happens next

Four studies in future consequences. Distinguish a verified finish, a short tactical proof and a useful feature that does not establish a win.

Print these four studies with answers

Use a prediction, a test and a reason

  1. Read the task before opening the answer. Say where a move lands or what it changes.
  2. Test it on the playable board. In two-player studies, play both sides to inspect a reply.
  3. Undo and compare one alternative. Use the answer’s stated search limit when explaining the result.
  4. Repeat the decision on paper, where the move cannot be checked for you automatically.

These are teaching groups, not a player-tested difficulty ladder. The four board IDs match the technique examples, individual study pages and print pack.

Remove the immediate danger

Orange to move. There is no immediate win for you. Which columns avoid handing the opponent a win on their next move?

Compare safe and unsafe drops

Orange to move. There is no immediate win for you. Which columns avoid handing the opponent a win on their next move?

Bring the idea to a fresh round

An immediate win can be checked exactly by making a legal drop and inspecting all lines. A forced defensive move or fork claim must also check the opponent's immediate winning replies. A local threat calculation is not a full-game solver or a promise of perfect play. Statements about central control or future shapes are strategic guidance unless a complete response analysis is supplied. The regular game has two local human players, not a computer opponent.

Open Four in a Row →

Playfield Arcade · Updated 3 October 2026 · AI-assisted writing and code; examples checked against the local game rules. Our method · Report a correction